Supreme , Case n.10188/2011
fall within the terms of the dialectic of the case 'sharp' between advocates and opponents do not constitute a crime. The decision of the Supreme Court that "not every expression that creates disappointment is for that reason alone , abusive or offensive expression is automatically a strong or pungent. "
For this reason, and even more so, when we discuss in of a process is common for parties "to discredit the opposing view, use phrases and words in a different context, could scarcely be tolerated."
All this according to our laws must be regarded as physiological place that was "in the presence of a radical and open contention between parties with conflicting interests and who express opposing view."
Define "ridiculous" the argument of his opponent, the Court explained, "is certainly a way of expressing unpleasant, and perhaps ethically reprehensible, but not for this integral the details of the rights under Articles. 594 or 595 cp ".
0 comments:
Post a Comment