Cassation, Judgement n.6870/2011
The discomfort that comes from the separation of parents does not justify acts of hooliganism committed by a minor. So the verdicts of the Supreme Court fore courts of first and second-degree young to have had cleared a scratched with a screwdriver in a BMW. After the "stunt" the boy had insulted and threatened the owner who wanted to terminate it.
The lower courts had declared the "not to adjudicate" against the boy because it marked the separation of parents and not considered capable of discernment and "immature" when the task had the offense. According to the college after a long time that there was no evidence of ability to understand that should always be provided in the processes that involve minors.
The decision was appealed to the General Prosecutor of Turin, which has earned a favorable opinion of stoats. According to the Supreme Court: "Because a child is recognized as incapable of discernment at the time of the offense must ascertain the nature and degree of disability such as to impair cognitive processes, evaluation and determined the subject." The specific conditions "socio-environmental and family" as painful, divisive and capable of inducing a kind of legitimacy to the car crime, " however, are not likely to prove impossible to realize the scope of negative actions. Neither are a form of mental illness that justifies impunity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment